Kathryn Bigelow heads back to the Middle East in her follow-up to 2009's The Hurt Locker -- the Best Picture winner that also made her the first woman to EVER win an Oscar for Best Director (great job, Academy! It only took 80 years) -- for a movie that chronicles the decade-long hunt for Osama Bin Laden. It's a no-frills procedural, about nothing more than it's about, and it's tense and smart and totally effective. If it doesn't amount to anything more than that, I'm ok with it.
The movie opens in blackness, as audio from the morning of September 11, 2001 plays on the soundtrack. It's a touch that some might consider exploitative, but Zero Dark Thirty isn't cashing in on the horror of that day for cheap entertainment. It's a necessary reminder that contextualizes everything that happens over the next 150 minutes:
This is what all of what follows is for.
Kathryn Bigelow is a great director -- one of the best currently working, particularly when it comes to action -- and it's her skill at creating a visceral experience that makes Zero Dark Thirty what it is: one of the best-directed films of the year. Like Argo from earlier this year, Zero Dark Thirty is masterful at generating tension and suspense from events even when we already know the outcome; the last half hour of the movie, in which SEAL Team Six raids the Bin Laden compound, is particularly incredible. But whereas with Argo we eventually sense the manipulative hand of the director -- it feels very much like a movie -- Zero Dark Thirty keeps things grounded throughout. The movie does not invent drama. It rarely (with the exception of one sequence) heightens a moment to increase the tension or raise the stakes. Yes, things are incredibly tense and the stakes are high, but those elements spring naturally out of the story being told.
It will be interesting to see the reaction to Zero Dark Thirty when the movie is released later this month. The movie is already picking up critics' awards, winning Best Picture from the New York Film Critics Circle just a few days ago. It will no doubt be compared endlessly to The Hurt Locker (even I couldn't resist), not just because it's Bigelow's second consecutive movie set directly in the aftermath of 9/11, but because it's the follow-up to her Oscar wins for Best Picture and Best Director. Like pretty much every other major release this year, I'm sure the response will be hyperbolic in both directions -- contemporary cultural dialogue only exists in extremes. It's incredibly well made, but I find it hard to be passionate about it after the fact. It's a movie that inspires an emotional response while it's playing -- it's super gripping and intense -- but not much of one after the fact beyond the obvious catharsis that comes from (SPOILERS FOR ACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS) seeing Osama Bin Laden shot in the fucking head. It is expertly made. It provides a good account of an important chapter in our recent history. If it lacks the takeaway of other Great Movies, that's not such a bad thing. It's about the job. The job got done.
Did they get the actor who played OBL in the "found" "confession" "tapes" to reprise the role for this movie? ;)ReplyDelete
I can't wait to see this. Thank you for writing about it!ReplyDelete
Saw this last night and I agree with just about everything you said.ReplyDelete
It's a really solid movie that works as a thriller (I might prefer this to Hurt Locker but I don't really have a whole lot of passion built up for either) and a procedural (not as good as Zodiac which I think is the gold standard for that type of movie). I'm not sure if I'll have too much of an urge to go back to Zero Dark Thirty though which is a trapping of a lot of "great" movies with heavy subject matter.
I would put it somewhere in the lower half of my top 10. Also, I really like Jessica Chastain. She's the female Chris Hemsworth for me where she came out of nowhere, Hollywood decided she was a star but I get it and am good with their decision.
I like "Zero Dark Thirty" OK but it's way overrated and nowhere near my top 10 (top 25 maybe). I'll give kudos to Bigelow for giving heft and gravitas to "ZDT," especially the opening minutes and the torture scenes, which were way uncomfortable for me to watch. At the end though this is still a propagandistic military thriller about a well-known and documented event that unfortunately still falls pray to the techno-thriller cliches (satellite photos, men with guns, computers, surveillance footage, etc.) we've been saddled with for years now with the "Bourne" series, "Homeland," "Person of Interest," the "Call of Duty" series, etc. BTW, when did Coach from "Friday Night Lights" become Hollywood's go-to mid-level government stooge? Between this and "Argo" Kyle Chandler is quickly becoming pigeonholed as a younger, hipper James Rebhorn. :-)ReplyDelete
"ZDT" tried to rise above its brethren, and instead what we're left is "Black Hawk Down" with a cipher chick at the core (which the very last scene tries to remedy but by then it's way too late) and a cast of mostly unknowns, all of whom work to great effect for 3/4's of the way. Then Tony fucking Soprano shows up and "ZDT," whether Bigelow intended it or not, becomes a howler of a comedy (at least in my NYC theater) until Gandolfini gets outta there. The 2nd half of the movie (right after the 'We are failing' speech that's in all the trailers) is much better than the first, especially since outside of news organizations' CG re-enactments of the raid this real-life intrepid military operation is now permanently immortalized on film thanks to Columbia's millions and the filmmakers' burning desire to repeat "The Hurt Locker's" Oscar mojo.
Yeah, right, like anything other than "Les Miserables" is going to sweep the Oscars this year. :-(
The film, much like it's heroine played by Jessica Chastain (The Help), is steely-resolved with eyes only for the task at hand.ReplyDelete