by Patrick Bromley
I have a strong suspicion that many of the reviews for Mission: Impossible: Rogue Nation, the fifth movie in Tom Cruise's nearly 20-year old action franchise, will begin by pointing out some variation on the fact that five movies and two decades in, the M:I series shows "no signs of slowing down." I would love to goof on this for being hacky and unoriginal if it weren't completely accurate. These movies seem to only get better the longer the series goes, and Rouge Nation cements the Mission: Impossible films as the best action franchise of all time.
Aside from the returning cast members -- this one brings back Cruise as Ethan Hunt, Ving Rhames, Jeremy Renner and Simon Pegg -- there's not much continuity that connects these movies, meaning they basically stand alone. You don't need to have seen the first four films to enjoy this one (though there are some mentions in the dialogue to the events of Ghost Protocol), which finds Alec Baldwin's CIA director demanding that the Impossible Mission Force (IMF) be disbanded and Ethan Hunt brought in to answer for his actions. Unfortunately, Ethan is detained as he hops the globe trying to prove the existence of The Syndicate, a collection of disavowed and declared-dead former secret agents working for the terrorist Lane (Sean Harris, appropriately despicable). Joining Ethan and the now-rogue IMF is Ilsa Faust (Rebecca Ferguson), a British agent whose motives and loyalties seem to be constantly changing.
A quick aside about McQuarrie, who is yet another in a long line of talented filmmakers chosen by Cruise and given a big opportunity to helm a huge movie without sacrificing what makes him special (when not already working with established geniuses, this is something that Cruise has been doing his entire career, Tom Cruise haters). McQuarrie crushes it. Did anyone see this coming? The Oscar-winning screenwriter of The Usual Suspects didn't direct a movie until Way of the Gun in 2000, and while I LOVE Way of the Gun, I love it specifically for its rough edges and rawness. There is very little in that movie to suggest he would be so good at handling a massive, slick commercial action movie. He didn't direct again until Jack Reacher in 2012 -- the movie that first paired him with Cruise -- and while I think that's also a terrific and more commercial blockbuster kind of movie, it's almost entirely about character and dialogue and plot. Seeing the confidence and ease with which McQuarrie directs the action sequences in Rogue Nation really blew me away. I just didn't know he had it in him.
It's those sequences that make Rogue Nation not just one of the best films in the Mission: Impossible franchise (it's tough to top Ghost Protocol, but this one might...I'll need to see it a few more times before I can decide), but also the most purely entertaining movie of this very crowded summer. While each new set piece is essentially about piling on new challenges for the heroes, each one manages to feel different and thrilling in its own way. McQuarrie is so canny about the way he shapes Rogue Nation, recognizing that it would be almost impossible to top the Burj Khalifa sequence in Ghost Protes and thereby opening the film with its most outrageous stunt in which Tom Cruise hangs from the side of a plane as it takes off (it's the one featured in all the advertising and even on the poster seen above). One might think, then, that the movie could only go downhill from there. One would be wrong. There's an incredible motorcycle chase, an underwater sequence shot in a series of long takes and an extended set piece at the opera that's a brilliant example of purely visual storytelling, taking place almost entirely without dialogue. It made me think that this is what a 2015 blockbuster might look like if it was directed by Alfred Hitchcock.
And because McQuarrie and Cruise have history together (going back to the WWII thriller Valkyrie, which McQuarrie wrote), the writer/director is incredibly clever about making this the movie that is at once the Tom Cruise-iest movie ever made while at the same time playing with the star's persona. Like last year's excellent Edge of Tomorrow, which worked as both a thrilling sci-fi action movie and as a meta-narrative about the origins of Tom Cruise's awesomeness, Rogue Nation is a Tom Cruise blockbuster that's also about being a Tom Cruise blockbuster. The very first shot we see of Cruise in the movie is of him running, something that he's famous for doing in every one of his films. Then he hangs on the side of a plane, outdoing himself in the stunt department. There are jokes about his height and jokes that take the piss out of his abilities (there is a section of the film in which he loses his "powers" like Superman in Superman II). At one point, another character asks "Do you really do all those things they say you do?" to which Cruise responds with just a look. As my astute wife (the biggest Tom Cruise fan on the planet) observed, this dialogue doesn't seem to be only in reference to stunts, but also to Cruise's personal life and religious affiliations. Yes, Rogue Nation is so good that it made me forget about Going Clear for two hours.
adaptation of Hercules directed by Brett Ratner, but Ferguson had little opportunity in that film to make any kind of impression. Not so here. From her first appearance, Ferguson holds the screen with a mix of intensity, athleticism and incredible sexiness. If she was a Bond girl, we'd be calling her one of our favorites. The costume designer who put her in her opera gown deserves a special award, as does the fight coordinator who decided she should perform her signature leaping leg lock move while wearing it (and McQuarrie is such a good screenwriter that he's able to make the move pay off in such a way that we don't even realize we were being set up the first few times we saw it). It's rare for Cruise to work opposite actresses of his celebrity status -- because there aren't many -- meaning he often makes some left-field choices in the leading ladies with whom he works. And yet what's rarely acknowledged about him is his willingness to star opposite women who are every bit his equal on screen. From Paula Patton in Ghost Protes to Emily Blunt in EoT to now Ferguson, Cruise's leading ladies are just as strong, competent and driven as he is. These are not damsels in distress in need of rescuing. These are characters -- and, by extension, actresses -- who could easily hold their own action films. Hopefully someone smart gives one to Rebecca Ferguson soon.
Ant-Man, it's a movie that's less about saving the world (though that's part of it) than it is about saving the people we care about. There is nothing bleak or moody, gritty or mean-spirited about it. As pop entertainment goes, it doesn't get much better. Tom Cruise has already suggested that Mission: Impossible 6 could be shooting as soon as next summer. With the path the series is going on and with this kind of quality control, that can't come soon enough. I love these movies.
I can't agree with you more, Patrick. I also made the Hitchcock comparison... well, in a roundabout way. The film sort of comes full circle to a certain extent, showing some heavy reverence for DePalma. On my drive home, both Hitchcock's name and DePalma's name bounced around in my head until I just settled on this conclusion: when something is DePalmaesque, it's basically Hitchcockian by default. I was relishing the editing in every sequence -- notably that masterfully pieced together motorcycle chase. And there certainly appears to be some intense adoration for The Third Man in the film too.ReplyDelete
So...when are you doing the"Way of the Gun" episode?ReplyDelete
That would be a good one. Haven't seen it yearsDelete
Is this an Imax movie, or would that extra $6 be spent more wisely elsewhere? I've been pretty good at avoiding trailers, so the only setpiece I'm really aware of is the unavoidable takeoff sequence.ReplyDelete
I did not see it in IMAX, and while there isn't anything in the movie that would rival the Burj Khalifa scene in Ghost Protes, I would probably try to see it in IMAX if I saw it again. Especially because there's no 3D.Delete
I saw it in IMAX last night. Definitely try to see it in IMAX.Delete
It looked great in IMAX. I liked the movie all in all but not as much as III and Ghost Protes.Delete
Thanks guys, I did see it in IMAX last night, and I thought it was great. I didn't like it as much as the first or Ghost Protes, but I think that's just a testament to what a great series MI is. Although I must say, I'm growing a bit weary of Ethan being disavowed, I hope the next filmmaker can find a new way to establish tension.Delete
Aside from that, I thought this had the best action in any movie since, well, maybe Ghost Protocol. The extended underwater/car chase/motorcycle chase was 25 straight minutes of boner-town. And I thought the opera scene was incredibly well staged, shot, paced, and edited. Just pure cinema.
Great point about how this film is reminiscent of Hitchcock. There was a great video essay over at Grantland.com that pointed out the strong ties to Hitchcock in all of the M:I films. It's really remarkable how Brian DePalma set the tone for the series, all for the better I might add.ReplyDelete
The reference to The Third Man and Welles's cuckoo clock monologue in Mission: Impossible 3 was completely lost on me until that video essay brought it up. Good shit. Allusions to The Third Man in Rogue Nation make much more sense now.Delete
I just adore this movie. It's my favorite MI film and probably favorite action film in years. It's unbelievable. Terrific review!ReplyDelete
Though McQuarrie directed "Rogue Nation" credit also has to be given to his 2nd Unit Director (i.e. the guy who directs the stunts), Gregg Smrz. Gee, you'd think with the 9-digit budget the movie was working with they could afford to buy Gregg a vowel for his last name! :-PReplyDelete
Just came from seeing it. Loved it, easily the best in a series of action movies I don't love (2 and 3 being the weakest, IMO) but which are all worth seeing at least once, and some ("Ghost Protocol") a bunch of times. What I liked about "Rogue Nation" is that, despite still being The Tom Cruise Show front and center, each of the last three "M:I" movies has made the team that Ethan works in more and more integral to both the story and the action sequences. While it's still far from an ensemble piece an "M:I" movie without Jeremy Renner, Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames or Rebecca Ferguson (no wonder Cruise wants to make "M:I 6" ASAP: get Ilsa Faust before Hollywood snatches her into other projects) would now feel wanting or with an integral part missing. Each character's bond with Hunt fuels his fire. The movie's final act (which I actually prefer to the Morocco break-in/action scenes, which are awesome) wouldn't work if we didn't sense how far Hunt will go to protect Benji and Ilsa from Lane's trickery. The final face-to-face scene? Classic, something only a writer/director as talented as McQuarrie could carefully build over the entire film so the payoff feels great. "Rogue Nation" earns the curtain call credits/music that the producers commissioned, which in a lesser movie would have felt gratuitous and masturbatory.
To me the evolution of the Ethan Hunt character as linchpin of an elite team of super secret agents (as opposed to being 'the one' he was in the first three movies), plus the fact they don't rush them out and always leave you wanting more, is why "M:I" movies keep getting better and better. I just hope that by fast-tracking the next one (understandable since Cruise isn't getting any younger) they don't break the franchise's ability to, if not top itself, at least leave you satisfied at the end that you've watched a damn good action flick.
BTW, does anyone else besides me wish that Tom Cruise would star in a remake/reboot of "Last Action Hero" written/directed by Shane Black and/or Brad Bird? I can't think of any movie star with the decades-long action track record and recognition (like Schwarzenegger had in his prime) that could pull it off except Cruise, and in the right hands the genre parody stunts these people could dream up would be huge. Anyone? Bueller, Bueller? :-(