by Heath Holland
If you’re a movie fan, it’s just a matter of time before you start to see the cyclical nature of the entertainment business. Nostalgia seems to operate on a 20-30 year cycle, but the entertainment cycle is even shorter than that, and seems to be shrinking by the day. When I first noticed it, the entertainment cycle was about ten years and you’d start to see the same stuff popping up every decade or so. Did you see that movie about the awkward-but-upwardly-mobile-career-woman who worked for that horrible boss and was in love with the co-worker who had attractive qualities mixed with some pretty noticeable character flaws? What about the thriller where that one guy had been accused of something he didn’t do and had to clear his name before time ran out? You can probably think of at least a few movies that fit these profiles, because just like the horses on a carousel, it all comes back around.
A while back, I had intended to write a piece comparing the various movie versions of the gunfight at the OK Corral. It seemed like it was going to be an easy task, because I thought there were just a handful of movies on the topic. The further I got into my research, the more movies I kept finding. By the time I finally gave up, I’d discovered over two dozen movies spread across the entire history of cinema. Every era of movies had their own version of the story, and there were even some that had nothing to do with the actual gunfight at the OK Corral, but had borrowed the story and put it in a new setting. I may still get to that column, but I probably won’t because there are just too many movies to wrap my arms around.
Things are no different now that we find ourselves in a world of franchises, where Spider-Man gets three unique approaches in a nine year span. These days, if a franchise entry doesn’t work, you just reboot and start again. I used to be really bothered when I would see someone recycle the same concept or idea of an older movie until I realized that there just aren’t that many ideas. I can’t even get mad about all the superhero sequels and reboots because OF COURSE the studios want to revisit things that worked or try again on something that failed. I can’t blame them. The more perspective you have, the more you realize that each time a movie tackles a well-worn theme or scenario, it’s just the latest attempt in a long line of attempts. If this one isn’t for you, you’ll likely see it again down the road and maybe THAT will be the one that clicks with you. They’ve been making and re-making the same ideas since before Hollywood was even a thing. They’ve been recycling successful concepts and overhauling failed ones. It’s just a big carousel of entertainment. Pick your horse and enjoy the ride. Trends come and go, but it’s all cyclical. If you wait long enough, your horse will come back around.
I’m coming to a place where I’m not bothered by similarities in my entertainment anymore. I’m not upset that Marvel Studios has movies scheduled through 2020 even though nobody knows if we’ll even want them by then, or that three more Transformers movies have been greenlit even though nobody demanded this. No, what I’m more concerned with now is how each new director or screenwriter will approach these projects. What is it that they’ve got to say? Does their entry make the movie landscape better or worse? Most importantly, do I feel like they gave it their all? I can name the flaws in Avengers: Age of Ultron and talk about how the studio muddled up the director’s vision, but I can’t fault director Joss Whedon because he clearly left everything he had on the screen. I can see his passion and his fatigue. On the opposite end of the spectrum, is a movie like Star Trek: Into Darkness, a movie that literally angers me. My problem isn’t that it copies Wrath of Khan, but that I don’t think the screenwriters and directors are invested in the story they’re telling. They’re going through motions that don’t appear to mean anything to them. I don’t feel any affection for the characters they’re playing with, and I don’t feel any passion in the screenplay. They’ve collected bits and bobs from another Star Trek movie that they know people like and hoped audiences will resonate with these things, rather than giving us a reason to care about what THEY have done.
The real danger in cinema isn’t the lack of originality; it’s a lack of passion.
There will almost certainly always be movies about superheroes fighting for a common cause (and against each other), love gone wrong, love gone right, jilted survivors looking for revenge, opposites who find themselves suddenly attracted to each other, teenagers looking for that one epic weekend, and a few brave men facing impossible odds to achieve something incredible. And if I can feel the heart and the soul of the people that made that movie on the screen, I’ll enjoy each and every one of them, no matter how many times I’ve seen the movie before. Are there too many superhero movies? Probably. Is the bubble going to burst? Eventually, but only for a while. Just like the T-800, they’ll be back. Sooner than anyone expects, I bet.
Great article, Heath. One of the reasons why The Force Awakens works is because we can feel the love for the material in every frame - it may be filled with references and signifiers, but JJ Abrams loves every little bit of this universe. Compare that with the disastrous Star Trek Into Darkness. What I find so maddening about that movie is I think the filmmakers really thought they were giving Star Trek fans what we wanted. It betrays their contempt for the franchise and its audience.ReplyDelete
Great article, Heath. Re-making stuff has been around since the dawn of Hollywood. Remember that The Maltese Falcon and BEN HUR are remakes. However, I take umbrage with the "Nobody wants another Transformers movie" statement. As a parent who wants to take his young son to the movies occasionally there are very few options. Every month there is an article about how a Disney film like Zootopia makes a ton of money and everybody is surprised. I know I'm waiting for the one good kids movie a month. Therefore an annual Transformers movie, although undeniably awful looks really good on paper. Especially if they let anyone but Bay make one. I would enjoy a "good" Transformers movie, however impossible that concept is to imagine.ReplyDelete
Don't get me wrong, I would enjoy a good Transformers movie as well. I'm the resident T-formers nut of this site. My loins yearn for Transformers movies made with passion and a sense of fun. Give me a Bumblebee that talks. Give me a movie that puts the robots in the lead roles instead of Shia LaBeouf and Marky Mark. Give me Judd Nelson. Give me Rodimus Prime. Give me a movie that I can believe was made by someone who watched, read, or played with a Transformer at some point in their life. I still hold out hope for any and all of these things at some point.Delete
Nice article Heath, while a lot of movies can be similar to one another (look at Jackie Chan's filmography) all the horses on the carousel have their own unique gallop to them or hell sometimes they are one of those sit down booth things they have in carousels (Hardcore Henry?) I wish more film makers and studio heads could get behind the idea of "yeah its all one big carousel but look at my horse 2nd from the back, he's got lightning bolts on the side of it."Delete