#8 – Psycho
The Plot In Brief: Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) meets for a secret tryst with her lover Sam Loomis (John Gavin) over a long lunch hour. Both are frustrated because financial circumstances will not allow them to marry. Back at the office, Marion brazenly steals $40,000 and sets off to share it with Sam. Tiring after a long night of driving, Marion decides to stop at a roadside motel to get a proper night’s sleep. The proprietor, Norman Bates (Tony Perkins) seems like a nice enough fellow, but he harbors many secrets.
At its core, Psycho is about loneliness. We witness the chance meeting of two impossibly lonely people and no good comes of it. Characters are vulnerable when alone: Marion in her small shower, Detective Arbogast sneaking back into the house alone. Loneliness leads to the grave. The film whispers that human connection is important; there is safety in numbers. The sheer number of characters in the police office at the film’s conclusion supports this. In the film’s famous last shot, Norman is still alone. Psycho is the story of a character so lonely, he allowed another person into his life in the most unconventional way imaginable. One of Hitchcock’s neatest tricks was marketing this serious meditation on loneliness and despair as a quickie exploitation horror movie.
an appreciation of Tony Perkins’ performance for this site in which I stated,
“I am impressed by all of Perkins’ line readings, but I think the pièce de résistance may be what he brings to one of the film’s simplest lines: ‘She needs me.’ Think about those three words—say them aloud. Most of us would emphasize the word ‘need,’ wouldn’t we? ‘She NEEDS me.’ Yet Perkins emphasizes the word ‘me’: ‘She needs ME.’ There is something so uncanny about that reading, so right for the material – it speaks volumes about the complicated relationship between Norman Bates and his mother. The character of Mother is not defined by her need; she is defined through Norman, and Perkins was astute enough to puzzle this out and manifest that through his line reading.”
This column is timely because an interesting new documentary premiered at the Sundance Film Festival just days ago. According to The Hollywood Reporter, “78/52 is an in-depth examination of the iconic shower scene from Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho, which required 78 setups and has 52 cuts. The shot-for-shot breakdown comes from writer-director Alexandre O. Philippe, who interviewed filmmakers like Guillermo del Toro, Bret Easton Ellis and Karyn Kusama about the lasting impact of the sequence that pushed the boundaries of chaste American filmmaking.”
We can all look forward to that! So take a shower, acolytes, I am taking all of you to the MOVIES.
Legend has it that, when the scene was edited, Hitchcock showed it to the Production Code Office for approval; they rejected it. Two of the five members of the board saw unacceptable nudity. Hitchcock waited a few days, then showed the board the exact same sequence with no changes. Now, the three members who had not seen any nudity claimed they saw some, and the two members who originally did said that they no longer did. At loggerheads over what to do, the Production code office approved the scene as edited.
Oh, and it is Shasta brand chocolate syrup being used as blood in the shower scene, not Hershey’s or Bosco. Some accounts get that crazy detail wrong. Assistant director Hilton Green has said that the crew used Shasta because it had just come out in a convenient squeeze bottle.
One of my goals in my upcoming retirement, when free time will be more than plentiful, is to recreate that commentary track and make it available on F This Movie (#PopePromise). Patrick has said he would love to post that as the podcast one week. Since I will be essaying that commentary track ALONE, two thirds of the way through, I will be violently murdered.
Psycho’s Three Miracles: Hitchcock’s directing prowess reaches a new peak as he guides the audience like a magician, misdirecting us over and over again, so the final reveal is devastating and delightful; Tony Perkin’s performance, so affecting that no one could shake it and he ended up typecast for life; and Bernard Herrmann’s beautiful, sad, shocking score, a funeral oratorio for strings.
In nomine Hitchcock, et Herrmann, y spiritu Perkins, Amen. “Mother… my mother… what’s the expression? She isn’t quite herself today.”
One of my favorite films. Vera Miles's exploration of the Bates manse is one of the creepiest sequences in movie history. Every time I see Norman's simple child's room, I feel such empathy for this lost, insane person.ReplyDelete
The controversy over Saul Bass and the shower sequence is fascinating. From what I've read about Bass, it seems so out of character for him to make such a grandiose claim (especially when there are boatloads of people who could refute it). There is a possibility that what Bass was referring to was when Hitch allowed him to set up the first few shots of the sequence. Back when Hitch was still a titles guy, a director for a film he was working on allowed him the same privilege. Hitch knew Bass wanted to direct movies one day, and may have let Bass set up a few shots in the same spirit. It's also possible Bass may have felt a desire to assert himself about his role in Psycho, because Hitch severely downplayed Bass's contribution to the film when he had his famous interview with Truffaut.
Beautiful words JB, I had forgot about Hitchcock not allowing you to enter the theatre halfway through, that is a good fact, I recently watched all 4 movies and the Psycho legacy a few weekends ago, part 1 really really holds upReplyDelete
Psycho is definitely one of my top five favourite horror movies. I love every second of it, even the psychiatrist's explanation at the end. I have been hoping for that commentary of yours to surface ever since it was mentioned on the podcast, and am awaiting it even more eagerly now!ReplyDelete
Psycho is nothing less than a masterpiece, and it's one of my personal favorites. I do take issue with the exposition at the end however. The information given is great, the method of it's delivery not so much. JB, what are your thoughts on that scene?ReplyDelete
I always thought the psychologist's monologue served two functions: it explains the whole thing for audience members who didn't quite get the previous scene and it gives audience members gobsmacked by the previous scene a little time to compose themselves. According to legend, after filming the monologue, Hitchcock approached Simon Oakland and said, "Thank you for saving my picture."ReplyDelete
Makes sense. Seems unusual that Hitchcock didn't desire a more filmic expression. Maybe the lower budget came into play? It's certainly a straightforward approach in terms of cost and time.Delete
I remember seeing this movie for the first time when I was 12. I watched it alone. I remember spending the psychologists monologue getting my heart rate back to an acceptable level before the following scene brought it back up. I think it actually helps give a brief false sense of security, as if the audience can finally get a handle on things, only to be dissolved in the final scene.Delete
I am a monster. I've only seen this once, and I was quite drunk and doing chores and laundry/etc. at the same time. I remember not really liking it, but I didn't exactly give it a proper chance.ReplyDelete
I should correct that soon.
There are too many movies in this excellent Cinema Bestius series recently that I haven't seen. I'll add this to the list. (My best friend swears by this movie as one of his favs, so I don't doubt the anointed wisdom of the Pope)