Tuesday, April 28, 2015

The Overlook: Jonathan Livingston Seagull

by JB
I may have just seen the worst movie ever made.

A well-meaning math teacher in middle school introduced me to the book Jonathan Livingston Seagull. I guess when I was eleven I thought it was deep. It may have been the first allegorical novel I ever read. I find the book laughable now: pure sixties hippie pap/self-help claptrap/just plain crap (papclapcrap).

In the feel-good seventies, a major motion picture was inevitable.

At the end of the opening credits, the audience is informed that the film is dedicated “To the real Jonathan Livingston Seagull, who lives within us all.” Great! Now I must have an expensive operation to remove the seagull who lives inside of me because the thought of a loud, filthy sea bird living inside my abdominal cavity FREAKS ME OUT.
The Plot In Brief: The titular seagull yearns to fly fast and fly well. The rest of his flock banish him. Jonathan continues his flight training alone. One day, two white gulls take him to “a different place,” where he continues his training with Chang, a wise old gull who has learned to travel anywhere instantaneously, without flying. (Apparently, the trick is in knowing that YOU ARE ALREADY THERE. Try it! I got to meet Abraham Lincoln this way.)

Chang encourages Jonathan to return to his flock, forgive them, and teach them. You know, so that the whole shebang can transform itself into a labored Christ allegory, only with more feathers. Jonathan returns to the flock and mentors a young gull named Fletcher. Metaphysical hijinks ensue. Could Jonathan be the only Son of the Great Gull?

That’s actually not a summary. That’s the whole plot.
Younger readers may be surprised to learn that, when this nonsensical book was originally published, it was a sensation, selling millions of copies and topping The New York Times bestseller list for 38 weeks. There were magazine articles, parodies, inspirational posters, t-shirts, coffee mugs, collectable plates, ashtrays, rug patterns, embroidery kits, and children’s lunch boxes.

“Forget Superman, Mamma! I want to eat every school lunch this year with my new best friend and personal savior, JONATHAN LIVINGSTON SEAGULL!”
The “novella” was pretty weak tea, but the film is even worse. Jonathan Livingston Seagull cuts out wide swaths of the original text because it would be too hard to film with real birds—who, in case I have not mentioned it yet, are the ONLY actors on the screen. Author Richard Bach actually sued the filmmakers, angry that the film did not contain more of his awful book. Director Hall Bartlett also sued Neil Diamond, claiming that the score he wrote for Jonathan Livingston Seagull was not up to his “usual high standard.” Diamond’s score went on to sell three million copies, and won a Grammy and a Golden Globe to boot.

I actually commend Bartlett for his ambition in taking on this project and deciding: a) NOT to make an animated film, à la Watership Down; and b) NOT to somehow invent CGI forty years before it was actually invented (though that would have made his job so much easier.) Instead, Bartlett spent two years filming real birds and then attempted (failed) to cut the footage into some form of narrative, hiring actors to record the trippy dialogue that was supposedly emanating from the gulls’ (non-moving) beaks.

What we have here is both a triumph of the Kuleshov Effect (which holds that audiences will forge a connection between ANY two shots in sequence) and what Disney old-timers used to call “illustrated radio.” The latter was their derisive term for done-on-the-cheap Saturday morning animation where the soundtrack conveyed all story information. Turn the sound off on these shows, the animators said, and you would be lost. Without its hushed, reverent, pseudo-mystical soundtrack, we might mistake Jonathan Livingston Seagull for a painfully slow Animal Planet documentary about seafowl.
Apparently Bartlett contracted a radio-controlled model airplane expert to manufacture some radio-controlled seagulls for long shots, but the parts of this film that made me queasy were all the sequences of the birds congregating on the ground. There is an extended sequence where the entire flock confronts Jonathan on the beach, and our protagonist is surrounded by hundreds of other, largely immobile birds. Did Bartlett somehow tie the birds down? Is that not beach sand that the gulls are standing on, but quick-drying cement? Is that a “stunt Jonathan” made of ground flounder that the other, real birds are eyeing hungrily? How the hell did Bartlett get this many birds to stay still for so long? Birdie tranquilizers?

Perhaps he played Neil Diamond’s score through loud speakers on the beach and induced the birds into a kind of coma.

Diamond’s score (and I use that term loosely) is stultifying. It is to pop music what narcolepsy is to medical science. The melodies are simplistic and repetitive, and the lyrics are, at best, muttery musings—half-formed notions instead of complete thoughts. Witness the lyrics of the first song on the (Grammy-winning!) soundtrack:

“Lonely Looking Sky”

Lonely looking sky
lonely sky, lonely looking sky
and being lonely...
makes you wonder why
makes you wonder why
lonely looking sky
lonely looking sky
lonely looking sky

Lonely looking night
lonely night, lonely looking night
and being lonely...
never made it right
never made it right
lonely looking night
lonely looking night
lonely looking night

Sleep, we sleep
for we may dream
while we may
dream we dream
for we may wake
one more day, one more day

Or we can turn instead to the movie’s “hit song,” which played on the radio all the time to hype the release of film. FUN FACT: The record album made a tidy profit; the film did not.


On a painted sky
Where the clouds are hung
For the poet’s eye
You may find him
If you may find him

On a distant shore
By the wings of dreams
Through an open door
You may know him
If you may

Actually, with its delusions of grandeur and nonsensical spirituality, Diamond may have been the perfect choice to score this empty-headed, hushed and reverent silliness.

LET’S ALL PLAY THE NEIL DIAMOND GAME: Take any simple phrase and then add pointless details and redundant prepositional phrases to it. Viola! You are a hit songwriter! For seagulls.

Susan have you seen
have you seen my socks
which I wear
as I wear over there
with a foot, then
have you seen them
have they been them
I have seem... then”

Draw out your vowels and shout the last line in a husky, macho voice. There it is: Instant Neil Diamond! Post your faux ND creations in the comment section below.

Legend has it that in his lengthy career as film critic, Roger Ebert only ever walked out of four movies*: Jonathan Livingston Seagull is one of them. He wrote in his review, “At [the] point when I walked out of Jonathan Livingston Seagull—some 45 minutes into the movie—the hero had learned to avoid garbage and fly high, but the film, alas, had not. I hardly ever walk out of movies, and in fact I sometimes make a point of sitting through bad ones, just to get ammunition for a juicy review. But this one was too much [....] [Jonathan Livingston Seagull] has got to be the biggest pseudo-cultural, would-be metaphysical rip-off of the year.”
As we’ve said before on this site, babies, we can’t argue with our eleven-year-old selves. I even purchased a parody paperback way back then: Jonathan Segal Chicken, written by Sol Weinstein and Howard Albrecht. Good Son of the Great Gull—I still have this book! In this slim and silly volume, Jonathan Segal Chicken refuses to live by the rules of his rigidly Orthodox flock and cannot imagine that his sole purpose on earth is to provide a kosher Sabbath meal. This causes flock leader Teyve Mostel Chicken to cluck out the song “Tradition” (which is, of course, sung to the tune of Fiddler On The Roof’s “Tradition”):

“Who is the creature
Made for men to bite,
Every Friday night
By the Sabbath light?

Whose awful fate is to end up on a plate,
and feed the human race’s face?

The Chicken!
The Chicken!

WAIT, THERE’S MORE: After a near-death experience in 2013, Bach was moved to write an epilogue and republish his masterwork as Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The New Complete Edition. I can hardly wait to (not) read it.

Frankly, I’m not even going to tell you where you can find this movie— I love you all too much. Use those two hours of your life to learn to fly high, babies.

Fly high. And then sigh. My, oh my. Never ask why. Right into that sky.


*For the record, the other films Ebert walked out on were Caligula, Tru Loved, and The Brown Bunny.


  1. Everything about this is mind-blowing. I didn't think I would learn so much today. Outstanding stuff as usual, JB!

  2. That was awesome. And, I must say, I strangely want to see this disaster of a movie right now (or, pop the Neil Diamond disc on the turntable). :)

  3. Ok, peeling back the curtain a little, I am a nature photographer in my spare time, I like birds and I have travelled here and there to photograph them, but even as a nature lover that enjoys watching birds and nature programs years ago I tried to watch this movie and also failed, it was just nonsense, interesting in the picture above JB the bird in the photo is not even a gull. Its a Ferel type pigeon or dove, that did make me chuckle, that and also papclapcrap, well done for getting to the end JB, fly high

  4. They showed this to my class in Jr. High. It's such a garbage movie. Unlike Ebert I had to watch this entire freakin thing. Argh. Frustration.

  5. I feel like the Overlook selections have been on a downward spiral lately. Hang in there JB! We appreciate all your pain and suffering!

  6. Thank you, Andy. Next week I talk about a GOOD movie!

  7. Hey, we brought Jonathan Segal Chicken back into print (and into ebook) last year. Because the world needs to know! http://aaugh.com/to.htm?1936404435

  8. You might not know many people saw a and loved it / beauty is in the eye of the beholder - I think yiu had fun making fun of it. I wonder what better use of your time and wit would bring to you?