Note: This column has spoilers for the first two Scream movies. You’ve seen them, right?
I’m happy that my high school years coincided with a resurgence in teen horror films (and teen films in general). I have many nostalgic memories of seeing and discussing I Know What You Did Last Summer (more on that later this month), Urban Legend, Disturbing Behavior, The Faculty, Halloween H20, etc., but no teen horror film was as big a deal to me as when I saw Scream during winter break 1996. It was, and still is, one of my favorite horror movies; equal parts tense, funny and always massively entertaining. I hadn’t even seen most of the movies Scream was referencing at that point and I still thought the movie completely worked. It was a cool movie. I was a bit of a wise-ass in high school, so I identified with Stu (Matthew Lillard) the most (he was a lot more popular than I was but I don’t kill people, so even-steven) and remember when he was revealed as one of the two killers in Scream, I was floored. I thought it was so brilliant and unexpected to make the class clown into the killer clown. Between December 1996 and Scream 2’s release in December 1997, I saw Scream probably five or more times. I couldn’t wait for Scream 2.
Me: “Hey guys, what time on Friday do you want to go see Scream 2?”
Jeff: “I can’t do Friday. Could you all go on Saturday?”
Me (answering for everyone): “That’s ok. We can see it separately.”
Jeff: “Wait, what?”
Me: “We’re going Friday. I don’t want to wait. We can do something else on Saturday.”
Jeff: “You can’t wait a day?”
Me: “So, because you have plans on Friday already we have to be held hostage from doing what we want to do?”
Jeff: “Jeez, relax.”
Me: “This conversation’s over. You’re out.”
Scream 2 was an event film, which is rare for the horror genre. It may have been more commonplace in the ‘80s with a Freddy, Jason or Michael Meyers movie, but I wouldn’t know because I was a ‘90s kid. I’m a champion of ‘90s horror, but I’ll admit that it was lacking in a lot of event horror for most of the decade. Scream 2 felt big and it had so much swag at the time. It was exciting to be there opening night to see it. The Saturday, second-day crowd wouldn’t be the same.
I remember liking Scream 2 on my first viewing but having some complaints about it at the time, most specifically the reveal of the killers. I wanted to be floored by the reveal like I was with Billy Loomis (Skeet Ulrich,#SkeetandGreet ) and Stu in Scream; by comparison, Mickey (Timothy Olyphant, who was kind of a nobody at the time) and Mrs. Loomis/Debbie Salt (Laurie Metcalf) felt like underwhelming choices. Mickey was forgettable and absent for practically the middle third of the movie. so the choice of him felt random and by convenience (his alibi could fit onto almost any character and it wouldn’t change the movie that much) and Mrs. Loomis sucked (for me, in 1997) because she was “old.” That sounds dumb to say nowadays, but part of what was great about the Scream franchise was how young and hip it was and choosing Mrs. Loomis seemed lame. I’ve since appreciated these choices more, but they’re nowhere near as impactful as Billy and Stu in Scream. The Mrs. Loomis arc makes sense, especially if the series ended after Scream 2, which unfortunately it didn’t because I don’t like Scream 3 at all and Scream 4 is not that good either.
Aliens, I would shut that shit down and scream “Can we learn how to make movies, please? What the fuck is this???!!! I could work at Blockbuster for this nonsense! DOES ANYONE WANT TO SEE TITANIC WITH ME??? I WILL NOT WAIT UNTIL SATURDAY!” I will say, though, these gripes come out of a place of love for Scream 2. They aren’t deal breakers.
As years have gone by, I feel like Scream 2 has become underrated. It gets lumped in with the third and fourth movies as a lesser entry, which I don’t agree with. While not the watershed 4/4 star movie that Scream was, I would say Scream 2 is a solid 3.5/4, which is especially impressive considering the movie was released less than a full year after the original. That’s a fast turnaround time for the cast, director Wes Craven and screenwriter Kevin Williamson. The production history of Scream 2 is fascinating unto itself, as the quick pre-to-post production schedule resulted in internet script leaks (revealing identities for killers who would later not be the killers) and the need for scenes to be shot the day their screamplay (I had to) pages were finished, often fleshed out on the fly by Wes Craven. It’s sort of a miracle that the film came together as well as it did. Credit for that should also go to editor Patrick Lussier (who would later become a director himself), as Scream 2 feels a bit flabbier than the first Scream but also maintains a high energy throughout that tips the scale back in its favor.
Scream 2 is also very much a meta commentary about sequels while also being a sequel itself. I don’t give a shit about any of that stuff. For me it’s the characters, the direction, the style, the nostalgia and the entertainment. That’s what makes Scream 2 special to me. Cleverness has a short shelf-life. Fun Fact: Did you know that some other titles considered for Scream 2 were Scream Again, Scream Louder and Scream: The Sequel? I am not kidding. In that spirit, I’m offering a suggestion of my own: Sidney Prescott and the University of Doom.
"It’s not Rocky Horror Picture Show, it’s the premiere of Stab. ".... that's kind of why I will never want to go watch the RHPS. If I wanted bawdy I'd eat lunch in a high school cafeteria, not watch a movie. (Note: I never want to eat lunch in the cafeteria)ReplyDelete
Also, nice review Adam. It's been a few years since my single viewing of this, and it has somewhat blended in with the 3rd and 4th installment, in my memory. Perhaps it's time for a revisit.Delete
Something that has annoyed me is that Randy sets the rules for sequels - he says the body count will be much higher and the deaths will be more gruesome - and the movie doesn't follow either of these rules. There is nothing remotely as gruesome as the garage door bisection from the first movie and if I remember correctly the death count is actually lower and certainly not higher. I can't figure out why they would tell the audience to expect the first movie except on steroids only to give a watered down version of it. Randy being wrong about his own movie is even worse to me than killing him off, which is what a lot of people seem offended by.ReplyDelete
I also don't like that they repeated the two-serial killer twist. The reason you couldn't guess it in the first movie was because it was an ingenious twist. The reason you can't guess it in the second is that you expect them to have a bit more respect for you as an audience member.
Having said all that, I really do like a lot of it. In particular, I think Cotton Weary's story is brilliant and the way the character plays off Sidney really resonates with me. They doubled down on him being a creepy weirdo but also doubled down on us, as audience members, sympathising with him. I think his character is very complex and psychologically interesting - classic Craven.
But at the end of the day Scream 2 < Shocker
The death count in 2 is certainly higher than the first. Including Maureen, Billy and Stu kill 6 people. Off the top of my head, I can think of at least 8 people killed in the second (Maureen and Phil, CiCi, Randy, the two Cops, Hallie and Derek). However, most of the kills are pretty uninspired. The only one that's really gory is the cop who gets rebar through his head, which was really more of a happy accident than anything.Delete
I mean yeah it wasn't very gruesome but what if you opened up a new scan seeing a bloody body like Randy everywhere. And when Mickey popped up at the end again for some reason I always flinch a little bit and then can't help just laugh I guess because it's Timothy. He pulled that off so well, terrifying and hilarious after it happens. This movie needs more credit just for how well it turns out especially being a sequel playing sequels. Absolutely perfect and fun.Delete
Totally agree with the opening. While I'm fine with the stab through the bathroom stall, and I've always loved the idea that someone you assume is your date has returned from the bathroom, albeit with a mask on...holy shit he just stabbed me...I always cringe at the theater etiquette. I was a manager at a Regal for years, so I managed crowd control more than a few times.ReplyDelete
But I really do love the Jada death. I always wonder...does she think Epps killed her...what a haunting way to die.
"Is the movie dated? Of course, but so are you [...]" Gold, Mr Riske, gold. Great review.ReplyDelete
Great read. Love all Scream movies, and like you, I agree the ending works better now than it did when I first saw it.ReplyDelete
I watched Urban Legend last week pre ScaryMovieMonth and I absolutely loved it. It's so good and the cast is great. All these movies are endlessy watchable.
I started rewatching Urban Legend late last night and am enjoying it a lot more than I did in '98. Now I'm not comparing it to Scream and just enjoying it for all its schlock.Delete
Super fun stroll down memory lane! I'm also a fan of the Scream movies for better or worse (yep even 3 & 4). However, the greatest part of this article was the ending mike drop...a perfect seven word review. You gonna use that or what?? :)ReplyDelete