We are all interested in bad movies, inexcusable cinema, and miserable art, for that is the stuff we use to fill our chubby cheeks when they are not crammed with chewed-up carrots. You are interested in the unknown, the mysterious, and the furry—that is why you are here. And now, for the first time, we are bringing to you the full story of some of the biggest bunnies ever made. We are bringing you all the evidence, based only on the secret testimony of the miserable soul whose bum-bum was gnawed by a bun-bun. I am that miserable soul. The absurdly low budgets, the inane dialogue, the famous actors sinking to a new low—my friend, we cannot keep these a secret any longer. Let us punish the guilty. Let us reward the innocent. Remember, my friends: terrible movies such as these will affect you in the future!
Halloween-themed podcast in 2010 in which Patrick and I discussed the best and worst horror films ever made. (FYI: This was NOT on the “Best” list.)
The Plot in Brief: The movie begins with a fake documentary about villages and towns all over the world that have become over-run with rabbits. Real documentary footage from Australia shows real rabbits really being killed. Yipes!
Cole Hillman (Rory Calhoun, giving the one decent performance in the film) experiences rabbit problems on his ranch. University President Elgin Clark (DeForest “Dammit, I’m a College Doctor, Not a Space Doctor!” Kelley) comes to Hillman’s aid and enlists the help of bunny experts/married couple Roy and Gerry Bennett (Stuart Whitman, a mere seven years from playing “Reverend James (Jim?) Johnson (Jimson?)” in Guyana, Cult of the Damned; and Janet Leigh, twelve years after starring in Psycho). The Bennett’s young daughter Amanda (Melanie Fullerton) accidentally causes a global ecological disaster by switching two test rabbits in her parents’ lab. Gigantic bunnies result.
Gigantic. Bunnies. I pause here to let that sink in.
The film was based on the novel The Year of the Angry Rabbit and was almost released as Rabbits when MGM came to this stunning, last-minute realization: there is NOTHING SCARY ABOUT RABBITS. Their resulting ad campaign for Night of the Lepus actually tried to hide the identity of the film’s hopping antagonists.
I remember watching this movie on late-night television when I was a kid. Even my fourteen-year-old self knew that this film was a ridiculous, incoherent mess. It seems at times like a group of semi-famous actors from the 1960s got together in their off-hours and made Night of the Lepus as a goof, shooting around Tucson in their street clothes and making it up as they went along. Then, to guarantee big laughs at the Hollywood cocktail parties where they intended to screen it, they hired some bleary cinematographers to film bunnies in slow motion, some drunken editors to splice the footage, and someone’s deaf uncle to write the music. It’s that bad.
Tombstone. The studio was opened to the public in 1960; I once visited there on a family vacation. It is a measure of how awful, misconceived, and poorly directed Night of the Lepus is that it shows absolutely no signs of being shot there. Old Tucson Studios is one of the most recognizable Hollywood locations on Earth; the little church set alone is iconic. Did director William Claxton feel comfortable there because he directed mostly Westerns, but then decided not to “desecrate” the place with this cheap horror picture so he instructed his crew to only film in back alleys and behind famous buildings?
The Critics Rave: In Horror Films of the Seventies, author John Kenneth Muir writes that the actors do their best, but that the horror elements and the film’s social conscience do not mix (yes, Night of the Lepus attempts a non-rabbit-themed ecological message, dripping with Seventies earnestness) Interestingly, John J. Puccio of the now-defunct DVDTown.com felt the filmmakers should have turned Night of the Lepus into a horror spoof instead of a “real” horror film. And Julia Merriam of Classic-Horror.com summed up the opinions of most contemporary critics when she wrote, “Frankly, unless you're a carrot, Lepus and its killer rabbits are far more likely to illicit peals of incredulous laughter than they are screams.”
The first time I was exposed to this movie was because of the stock footage used from it in Natural Born Killers (I think the final shot in that movie may actually be one from this movie.) I thought it was one of the most memorable things about it. Gigantic bunnies may not be scary, but there's definitely something about them that stimulates the psyche.ReplyDelete
Time for BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER TRIVIA: Footage from Night of the Lepus plays in the background of the fourth season finale "Restless."ReplyDelete
Great movie JB. Remember it as a kid, loved it then as much as I do now.ReplyDelete
The scariest thing about this movie is the real footage of rabbits being killed in the beginning. And it's the constant portrayal of animals being hurt or killed through it that keeps it from being hilariously bad.ReplyDelete
In fact, I thought it was the son of Calhoun's character that actually releases the experimented on bunny because he hates rabbits after his horse broke his leg in a rabbit hole (and somehow setting it free is getting even?)....?
Surprised to hear that the Lepus title was decided after the film was made since there's so many times they use the word AND then explain it for fear the audience didn't know it.
Thanks for this hilarious review. The producers of this movie were idiots! Their stupid minds thought that this would be a blockbuster! Stupid, stupid, stupid humans! Ha!ReplyDelete
You people are crazy. This movie was and always will be hilarious. Scary? Not at all.ReplyDelete
I saw this when I was probably around 8 yrs old. I can still remember how hard I laughed the first time the little girl screams and then they just show a close up of a bunnies face munching away looking cute. Cinematography was some of the worst ever, but this movie deserves cult classic status for sure. Funniest horror movie ever.