by Patrick Bromley
Without even realizing it, Tony Scott's movies have been covered a lot on F This Movie!. He's a director whose movies I have often enjoyed without realizing that it's because I like him as a filmmaker. Hopefully, today's list puts it in perspective.
1. The Hunger (1983) - Scott's first feature is best remembered for the love scene between Susan Sarandon and Catherine Deneuve (for good reason), but it also announces the arrival of a gifted stylist -- if not a storyteller. Not yet, anyway. It's a great looking, stylish movie (and introduced a lot of Scott's visual signatures), which is the right choice for a vampire movie that's all about being sexy and keeping up appearances. It succeeds more in moments (like David Bowie's aging sequence, or the aforementioned love scene) than as a whole, but the moments are pretty terrific.
Top Gun (1986) - While I've never been a Top Gun fan, it's impossible to deny the movie's cultural impact. Scott brought his experience as a commercial director, combined it with MTV style and created the aesthetic that still informs modern action movies over 25 years later. This is on the short list of movies for which Scott will be most remembered, and that makes sense -- even if just about every subsequent movie he made was better.
3. Revenge (1990) - People tend to associate Tony Scott only with flashy crap: quick editing, smokey lighting, no substance. Top Gun boxed him in in a way I don't think he predicted, and he spent a lot of his career pushing back against what everyone assumed a Tony Scott movie could be. His films would get much darker in the 2000s, suggesting that he was getting edgier or facing his own morality more the older he got. But Scott was going really dark all the way back in 1990 with the Kevin Costner drama Revenge, a nasty bit of melodrama that's gorgeously photographed (because Tony Scott) and refuses to back down. Released the same year that Costner became the Golden Boy of Hollywood thanks to Dances With Wolves, it's no wonder the movie bombed at the box office. Both Scott and Costner were stretching themselves with this one, and they got hammered for it. Time has been good to the movie, which remains one of Scott's most underrated.
4. The Last Boy Scout (1991) - As if in response to the failure of Revenge, Tony Scott went back to the kind of movie he does best: flashy, violent, tough and cool. Luckily, he makes that kind of movie better than most, and is at his best when he as a good writer working with him. Shane Black is a really good writer. Looking back at his entire filmography, The Last Boy Scout almost feels like "minor" Tony Scott. Maybe he should have done minor more often.
5. True Romance (1993) - Tony Scott's masterpiece is a love letter not just to movies, but to exactly the kinds of movies that he spent his career making. His trademark style is put to its best possible use, reflecting the mental state of two characters (Clarence and Alabama Worley, my favorite movie couple of all time) who fancy themselves as the heroes of a slick, violent Hollywood action movie. It's one of the few Quentin Tarantino scripts that has been directed by someone other than Tarantino, and Scott proved to be a better choice. It feels intensely personal to both of them, and Scott doesn't just deliver a skillful technical exercise. He pours his whole heart into it.
7. Spy Game (2001) - Another of Scott's attempts at a more serious "adult" drama, Spy Game lacks the entertainment value and excellent movie star turns of Crimson Tide (Robert Redford and Brad Pitt are both fine, but kind of mopey). Time will be good to Spy Game, which clearly has deep roots in the kinds of smart, paranoid thrillers that were commonplace in the 1970s. It was another attempt by Scott to stretch himself, and just about every one of those movies wound up being better and more interesting than his more commercially-minded efforts.
8. Man on Fire (2004) - Here's the movie that reshaped Scott's career and defined the last phase of his career, not just because it kicked off a series of collaborations with Denzel Washington (reuniting with the director for the first time in nearly a decade). Scott's editing and photography got much more experimental here, with a hallucinatory quality that's technically impressive but aesthetically maddening. The movie suffers from a bloated length and Scott's refusal to get technique out of the way of the story, but Denzel's performance and the movie's willingness to double down on its own badass darkness ultimately make it work. I'm not sure I agree, but this is likely to be remembered as on of Tony Scott's best.
Domino (2005) - Clearly drunk on the style he introduced with Man on Fire, Scott took so much of what was frustrating about that movie and turned it up to 11 for his psuedo-biopic about model-turned-bounty hunter Domino Harvey. Working from a Richard Kelly script that tries really hard to have it both ways, the movie is all crazy editing, fractured narrative and whacked-out sound design. There are theories that the whole thing is meant to emulate a peyote trip, but that's a) not supported by the text and b) not a successful movie experience. There's actually a lot to like in Domino, but it's clear that Scott had pushed style to its breaking point. Luckily, he rebounded.
10. Deja Vu (2006) - Tony Scott's most underrated movie is also his last really good one. Reteaming with Denzel Washington again, Scott pulls back on the style and once again devotes his attention to characters for a movie that's part action, part drama, part romance. It's also his only real entry into science fiction, and while there are some major plot holes, the way in which Scott gradually reveals what's actually going on is both clever and thrilling. If you haven't seen it -- and chances are you haven't -- it's best to go into this one totally blind. It's also nice that after a couple of really bleak movies, Scott finds some optimism again. Domino took him way down into the darkness, but he came out the other side a seemingly happier filmmaker. It would not last, but his movies will.
Man, I miss Tony Scott way more than I thought I did.
1. Michael Bay
2. Woody Allen
3. Ron Howard
4. Sidney Lumet
5. Paul Verhoeven
6. Steven Soderbergh
7. Tim Burton
8. Joe Dante
9. Robert Zemeckis
10. Michael Cimino
11. Wes Craven
12. Spike Lee
13. John Landis
14. Brian De Palma
15. Steven Spielberg
As the director of a movie actually in the Top 5 of my 20 Top 5 Favourite Movies - True Romance - Tony Scott's suicide actually bummed me out a bit. Reviewing this list made me realize what a fan of his I am in general. The Hunger is...interesting, I LIKE Top Gun (as a friend - I'm not in like with it), I really dug The Last Boy Scout, loved Man on Fire and actually really liked Deja Vu (didn't even realize that was one of his until now).ReplyDelete
Will definitely check out Revenge which sounds interesting and Domino - for some stupid reason I always thought that movie was about the B-list comic book character! Sounds like it's worth a watch too.
Nice tribute - it's especially sad to lose such a prolific director so relatively young - no doubt he still had some great movies left in him.
I'm super happy you gave props to Crimson Tide which is THE BEST SUBMARINE MOVIE OF ALL TIME. Science Fact. Great column Patrick!ReplyDelete
Crimson Tide is a great movie no doubt. A true classic of the genre. But the single best submarine movie? Oh the hyperbole.Delete
Have you seen Das Boot or the 1959 classic The Enemy Below with Robert Mitchum and Curt Jurgens?
Man, I love the submarine genre.
I have not seen The Enemy Below so here is my revision...Crimson Tide is MY FAVORITE SUBMARINE MOVIE OF ALL TIME.Delete
Oh and I'm placing you under arrest on the charge of mutiny.
I am turning in my missile key and will report to my cabin.Delete
Crimson Tide is great. Pretty sure it is deserving of a podcast episode. It's got so much going on ... Tony Scott directing, Tarantino playing script doctor, Simpson and Bruckheimer producing, a pre-Sopranos Gandolfini, a pre-"name" Viggo Mortensen, Denzel and Hackman chewing scenery like nobody's business ... all inside a nuclear submarine with nothing less than the fate of the world on the line. Classic.Delete
I keep meaning to check out Spy Game. It's always pretty cheap when I see it in stores, but it would be a blind buy, and I just haven't taken the plunge yet. I'm intrigued by it not only becasue I do appreciate some of Tony Scott's work, but also I think the casting of Brad Pitt and Robert Redford struck me as potentially being a good pairing of actors. It sounds like I might expect more of out of both of them than I will actually get, though. Still, it looks decent to me, so maybe I'll give it a rental someday.ReplyDelete
Tony Scott was an interesting filmmaker. He was certainly not my favorites, as Crimson Tide and True Romance are the only movies of his I have much interest in returning to, but it was still a bummer to see him go so soon and so abruptly. I agree with Sol in that Tony Scott probably still had some good or great ideas left in him. It's too bad we won't get to see those come to fruition.
I never really bothered to form an opinion on him as a director, just his movies. I've liked some of them, but always thought he was kind of hacky. Really considering his whole body of work, though, and picking these 10 movies made me realize he was much more of an artist than I ever gave him credit for being. Of course, he still made junk like The Fan and Days of Thunder (and Top Gun, which had to be on this list even though it's not as good as the others), so that was probably what I was thinking of when he popped into my head. I don't know.Delete
Eh, neither did I, really, until his death. The closest I came to an opinion of him was "well, I like Ridley Scott better." I don't think it's really necessary to compare the two, but I did it anyway. Now, I feel that I underestimated him as an artist with lots of his own style. His movies also facilitated some great Denzel Washington performances, which I appreciate.Delete
Geez, this is so sad. And do you know that I have owned and loved True Romance for years and didn't register that it was a Tony Scott movie? I think so much attention was given to it because it was a Tarantino script, and I knew Tarantino didn't direct it, but I forgot totally that Tony Scott did. Great column, Patrick.ReplyDelete