by Adam Riske
The Conjuring is not perfect, but my complaints are minor. It’s what I like to call "pinball horror," which means it’s a big, flashy thing that promises nothing but quick, ephemeral enjoyment. It’s spooky, well-acted and a rare movie that actually seems to like its audience. I can see myself going back to this one every couple of years for Scary Movie Month.
In full disclosure, I’ve been rooting for this movie for months. With Insidious, I did a complete Tatum on director James Wan – i.e. I used to not like him at all and now I only feel like defending him. Wan is one of horror’s good guys, meaning he’s not only technically very skilled but seems to be coming to the genre from a place of reverence and sincerity. The Conjuring had a great trailer, a cast of actors I’ve liked in the past and came out with very strong buzz in the past few months. I was primed to like it.
I had a few small issues with The Conjuring. The main one is that it’s spooky as opposed to being really haunting. It sort of evaporated from my head right after it was over and didn’t keep me up at night. When I said I’d recommend the movie to people who don’t like horror movies, what I mean is that it’s sort of "safe" horror, like The Others or The Ring. There’s also not much originality, plot or structure-wise. It owes a lot to Poltergeist and The Exorcist. The Conjuring has some depth, but most of that is brought by the acting. This is a movie that is exactly what it seems on the surface. I also didn’t feel like the movie went off the rails enough, despite the level of mayhem on hand. It’s the story of a director willing to go only so far, which is a surprise if you’ve ever seen James Wan’s 2007 movie Death Sentence, which goes way too far.
This is the End, Fast and Furious 6, Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters). Deep character relationships like that help do a lot of the heavy lifting in a movie and add shades that might not have been there. It’s a chemistry thing. Wan’s last two movies, Insidious and The Conjuring, LOVE the family unit. They don’t want to machete the son in the neck and then later murder the mother and put the only other son in a coma (fuck you, Death Sentence). It’s funny that one of Wan’s next movies is Fast and Furious 7. At first, I thought he was an odd choice but now it makes total sense. Fast and Furious has somehow become the most family values-oriented action series in recent memory. It’s like Full House with cars. Fast 8 should take place at the Olive Garden, just them having dinner. Fast 9 is Fastelvania, where they try to steal Dracula’s brides (one of them played by Gal Gadot) and drag race on cobblestone Transylvanian roads. Fast 10 has already been established by Doug and Patrick to take place in outer space (maybe a Sung Kang cameo as Jor-El). We have a lot to look forward to. All roads have led to this. You guys, Lucas Black might come back! You know, drift king, DK.* I want a beer, as long as it’s a Corona.
But back to The Conjuring. The characterization in this movie is awesome. I love the Warrens. I could watch 20 movies with those two characters just taking on new cases of the occult and paranormal -- fingers crossed they become the Indiana Jones of horror for the next few years. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga are so good, as they always are, at playing them because they are so matter-of-fact and compassionate. They make nonsense dialogue go down smoothly because their characters truly believe what they’re saying. It’s cool that Wan went with this approach. He is fascinated by the characters and doesn’t present them as kooks or con artists in any way. The Perron family is also well-acted, with a nice part for Lily Taylor that might be her apologizing for her work in The Haunting. It’s great to see her in a studio movie again for more than five minutes. Minor characters like the cop or the Warren’s assistant, Drew, are given little bits of business to make them seem like rounded characters. I especially liked all the stuff with the UV light, which Wan uses to show how out of depth the cop is and as a prop for Drew to try and pick up the oldest Perron daughter. In the midst of a haunting, young men are still thinking about getting laid. That’s amusing. I’d also argue that even the ghosts have personalities. None are random specters there simply because they look scary.
*P.S. Why didn’t they get DK to pilot one of the Jaeger’s in Pacific Rim? If you wanted to have someone that’s great in the drift, um, shouldn’t you have Drift King?
Loved this film. And you are spot on about the title card! Reminded me of old 70's horror. Definitely an ode (although not sure if it was intentional) to The Shining as it scrolls up the and takes over almost the entire screen.ReplyDelete
Agreed! The first hour is best, full of great dread and boos. The second hour becomes very conventional-- perhaps because the filmmakers are maintaining that all of this actually happened. I thought it owed a bit to the original Amityville Horror, the real-life case of which the Warrens also worked.ReplyDelete
I haven't seen Amityville. Worth watching?Delete
The original version definitely is. In Danse Macabre, Stephen King talks about it being an "economic horror film," in that the real horror is that the couple has sunk all their money into this house that is now haunted and so unsellable. There are echoes of this in a scene in Conjuring too. The Conjuring also contains what I believe is a sly shout out to the Amityville incident-- at the end of the film, the Warrens say they have to go "check out that house in Long Island." I believe they are referring here to the Amityville house!Delete
Spot-on review, and I hadn't thought about "family" being the connective tissue between Wan's ghost stories and Fast 7 but I think you're absolutely right. Great call.ReplyDelete
Insidious had a pretty great title card, too, but I liked how the one in The Conjuring added to the 70's vibe.
Sort of off-topic, but as for Death Sentence, I read the book not too long ago then immediately rewatched the movie and couldn't believe they kept the title because that's the only thing the book & movie had in common. Not one scene, situation, or even character seemed inspired by anything in the book, it seemed such an odd choice to claim otherwise.
fingers crossed they become the Indiana Jones of horror for the next few years.ReplyDelete
YES. I would love this.
Great review; you said exactly what I thought, but much more eloquently.